3 minute speech on social networks

But first of all we need to understand what empowerment of women really means if we have to understand its impact.

3 minute speech on social networks

This time, the topic was on the content filtering practices of Facebook, Twitter and Google. Back in May there was actually a whole one day conference in Washington DC on this topic. The Judiciary Committee would have been a lot better served attending that than holding this hearing.

I'd recommend not wasting three hours of your life watching this thing, but if you must: The shortest summary would be that some Republican members of Congress think that these websites censor too much conservative speech, and some Democratic members of Congress think that they don't censor enough other speech including hoaxes and conspiracy theories There's a narrative that has been picked up by many that insist that social media platforms are unfairly censoring "conservatives.

Internet censorship - Wikipedia

Indeed, a thorough analysis of the data back in March by Nieman Labs and Newswhip found that conservative-leaning sites get much, much, much more engagement on Facebook than liberal-leaning sites. But, never let facts get in the way of a narrative.

Since that seems to be the way many hyperpartisan sites at either end of the spectrum deal with these things, Congress is helping out. The only bit of sanity, perhaps bizarrely, came from Rep. Ted Lieu, who reminded everyone of the importance of free markets, free speech and the fact that private platforms get to decide how they manage their own services.

Considering that Republicans often like to claim the mantle of being the "small, limited government" party who wants the government's hands out of business regulation, the fact that most of the hearing involved Republicans screaming for regulating internet platforms and a Democrat reminding everyone about the importance of a free market, capitalism and free speech, it really was quite a hearing.

Lieu's remarks were some of the rare moments of sanity during the hearing -- including defending Facebook leaving Alex Jones' conspiracy theories on its site. Let's start with that high point before we dive into the awfulness. His comments come at about 2 hours and 10 minutes into the video: It's stupid because there's this thing called the First Amendment.

We can't regulate content!

Real news, curated by real humans

The only thing worse than an Alex Jones video is the government trying to tell Google We can't even do it if we tried. We can't even do any legislation out of this committee. And we're having this ridiculous second installment hearing after the first hearing about Diamond and Silk not getting enough likes on Facebook.

He then went on to ask questions "so the American public understands what a dumb hearing this is.

Home - TTAC Online

Specifically he asked the companies if they were private companies aiming to maximize profits for shareholders. And he wasn't doing that to show that companies were evil, he was doing that to show that that's how the free market works.

He followed up with this: I noticed all of you talked about your own internal rules. Because that's what this should be about.

You all get to come up with your own rules. But not because government tells you what to do. Or because government says you have to rule this way or that way.

And the whole notion that somehow we should be interfering with these platforms from a legislative, governmental point of view is an anathema to the First Amendment. And really it's about the marketplace of ideas. This is the kind of speech that you'd normally expect to hear from a "small government" conservative who talks about respecting the Constitution.

3 minute speech on social networks

But, in this case, it's a Democrat.The movie, connected to the Harry Potter world, took in $ million in ticket sales. Jul 18,  · The shortest summary would be that some Republican members of Congress think that these websites censor too much conservative speech, and some Democratic members of .

Internet censorship is the control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet enacted by regulators, or on their own initiative. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences.

Adventures in Femtoland: Yuan for Invaluable Fun. GSM networks are compromised for over five years. Starting from passive sniffing of unencrypted traffic, moving to a fully compromised A5/1 encryption and then even to your own base station, we have different tools and opportunities.

Sponsor Posts

Dear Twitpic Community - thank you for all the wonderful photos you have taken over the years. We have now placed Twitpic in an archived state.

The mission of Virginia's Training and Technical Assistance Centers (T/TAC) is to improve educational opportunities and contribute to the success of children and youth with disabilities (birth - 22 years).

The Centers provide quality training and technical assistance in response to local, regional, and state needs. T/TAC services increase the capacity of schools, school personnel, service.

Internet censorship in China - Wikipedia